GVS - Genuine Verification Services
Talk to sales

RCU services for banks and NBFCs

GVS runs the Risk Containment Unit function for lenders. Before a loan is sanctioned we screen the file, verify the documents against the record held by the authority that issued them, and put a field agent at the borrower's home, office and place of business. Every finding comes back with the evidence under it.

A loan application file linked to the three places its claims are checked: an official register, the borrower's premises and a screening list
Trusted by 500+ companies
Canara BankChannelplayTata AIG InsuranceMacgenceIndiaMARTOlive Green ConsultingPunjab & Sind BankZee MediaJobkartKazamAvalon Information SystemsMeruBTCQuytechGreat Eastern Energy CorporationGiginBharat BhushanPilot IndustriesShipex IndiaKW GroupWise FinServPTC NetworkOrcapodadaanSouthern TravelsElectricaBaby & Mom RetailSyscomLarkRoots DevelopersGMSCircleRightRudra ShieldEssential EnergyAviaxpert

An RCU asks a different question

Credit appraisal asks whether the borrower can repay. The Risk Containment Unit asks whether any of it is true. The two run beside each other, and the second one is the last gate before money moves.

Credit

Can this borrower repay?

Your appraisal, on the numbers as submitted.

  1. Income and obligations assessed against the product.
  2. Bureau score and repayment history read.
  3. Eligibility and ticket size worked out.
  4. The file moves toward sanction.
Risk containment

Is this application genuine?

Our work, independent of whoever sourced the file.

  1. Documents checked against the issuer's own record.
  2. Declared income tested against the income proofs and the tax record.
  3. The address, the office and the business seen in person.
  4. The file screened against your fraud and rejection database.

How a file moves through the RCU

Four stages before sanction, and three ways a case can close. Each stage links to the section that explains it.

Positive

Everything checked stood up, and the file carries the source responses that say so.

Negative

The discrepancy is named and what the source said is attached alongside it.

Refer

Not enough to call it honestly. We say what is missing rather than round it up or down.

The sanction decision stays with you. We report the finding and what it was checked against. We do not recommend a sanction.

Screening and sampling

Every file logged in gets screened. Anything that does not sit right gets pulled, and an agreed share goes to full verification. The share is yours to set, not ours.

Every file screened

100% of files logged in are read for suspect documents and suspect profiles. Nothing is sampled out at this stage, because the point of the screen is to find the files worth spending money on.

Suspect files pulled

A document that does not match its issuer's format, a profile that contradicts itself, an applicant you have already rejected once. These come out of the run whether or not the sample would have caught them.

Sampled to your percentage

The agreed share of logged-in files goes to full verification alongside everything the screen flagged. Most lenders set the share by product and ticket size, with more on secured and high-value files.

Findings reported

One report per batch, in your format, inside the turnaround the mandate sets. Each finding names the document, the discrepancy and the source it was checked against.

The sampling percentage is a policy decision. It belongs in your mandate, not in our discretion, and we report against it so an internal audit can see that the screen was total and the sample was met. If a batch runs over the flagged share, you hear that with the batch rather than at the end of the quarter.

Document verification, at the issuing authority

A forged salary slip passes a rules engine. It does not pass the employer's HR department. Every document is checked against the record held by the body that issued it, and the reply is kept.

KYC documents

Aadhaar, PAN, passport, voter ID, driving licence and utility bills, matched against the issuing record rather than read off the scan.

Salaried income

Salary slips, Form 16, appointment and increment letters, confirmed with the employer and against the deductor's TDS record.

Self-employed income

Income tax returns, audited financials, GST returns and business registration, checked against the filings themselves rather than the printout supplied.

Income consistency

The income proofs read against each other and against the tax record. A payslip figure the employer will not confirm, or a proof that appears only once the file was logged, is the finding.

Property documents

For home loans and loans against property: title, sale deed, sanctioned plans and approvals, and encumbrance, checked where they are actually registered.

Entity records

ROC and MCA records for companies and LLPs, and the licences, registrations and approvals a new unit says it holds.

What gives a file away. Fonts and layout that do not match the issuer's own format. A TAN that does not exist against the deductor named on the Form 16. A return filed days before the application. Credits that do not add up to the declared income. Each is reported as what it is, with the source response attached, and the credit call stays yours.

Field investigation

Digital lending took away the branch manager who knew the neighbourhood. A field visit is how that knowledge is rebuilt: somebody stands at the address and reports what is actually there.

An office that turns out to be a residential flat. A manufacturing unit with no equipment in it. A trading company with no goods on the floor. None of that is visible in a file, and all of it is visible in twenty minutes on site.

Visits are planned or unannounced, as your mandate requires, and the report carries photographs and the location the visit was made from.

Lending team reviewing a case file
01
Residence verificationThe stated home address is visited, occupancy confirmed, and how long the applicant has lived there recorded, including what the neighbours say.
02
Office and employment verificationThe workplace is visited and the employment confirmed with somebody who can actually confirm it, not with the number printed on the letter.
03
Business and unit verificationFor self-employed and MSME files: is the unit running, is there stock, is there equipment, and does the trade described match what is on the floor.
04
Guarantor checksThe same standard applied to guarantors as to the borrower. A file is only as good as the person standing behind it.
05
Negative area and profileThe address is checked against your negative-area list and the applicant against your negative-profile criteria, before anything further is spent on the file.
06
Evidence that survives the visitPhotographs of the premises and the location the visit was made from, retained with the report so a finding can be re-read months later.

Contact point verification is not the same thing

Lenders buy both and they answer different questions. Running one and calling it the other is how a file gets through.

Reachability

Contact point verification

Is this applicant where they say they are, and can you reach them?

  1. The stated mobile number is called on a recorded line.
  2. The residence, and the office where the mandate asks for it, is visited.
  3. Relationship to the address and time at the address are recorded.
  4. The outcome is positive or negative, and a negative one escalates the same day.
Authenticity

Risk containment

Is what this applicant told you true?

  1. Documents checked against the record the issuer holds.
  2. Declared income tested against the income proofs on file and the tax record.
  3. The file screened against your fraud and rejection database.
  4. The business itself inspected where the file warrants it.

Why the distinction matters in recovery. If a borrower defaults and the contact point was never real, collections has nowhere to go. CPV is what makes an account recoverable. Document verification is what stops the account being written in the first place. They are not substitutes for one another.

Screening beyond the file

Not everything an RCU catches is in the application. Four activities that sit outside the sanction queue.

Negative and dedupe screening

Applicants screened against your own fraud and rejection database, against bureau fraud alerts, and against negative lists. A hit stops the file where it is.

Seeding and mystery shopping

A posed application run through your own channel, to see whether a branch, a DSA or an associate actually follows the customer identification process they are meant to.

Post-disbursal verification

After the money moves: is the borrower still at the address, and was the facility used for the purpose it was sanctioned for.

Case investigation

Desk and field work on one suspect file. Lifestyle against declared income, business associates, and a previous employer's view of the applicant's integrity.

What lands back with you

A finding you can act on, the evidence under it, and somewhere to watch the batch while it runs.

Positive, negative or refer

Three outcomes, no fourth. We do not soften a negative to keep a file moving and we do not resolve a refer by guessing. What we could not establish is stated as exactly that.

The source response, not our summary

The issuer's own reply, the registry's own record, the photographs from the visit. Your risk team and your auditor read what we read, months or years later.

In your format, in one place

Reports built to your template and submitted through the client portal, with every case in the batch trackable while it is open.

Independence is the point of the function. An RCU finding is worth nothing if the channel that sourced the loan can influence it. GVS is engaged by your risk or credit function and reports to it, and nobody in the sourcing chain sees a finding before you do. Anything that looks wrong is escalated when we see it, not held back for the batch report.

Borrower files are the most sensitive data a lender holds. RCU work is carried out on your instruction, under the KYC and loan documentation the applicant has already signed, and handled under India's DPDP Act. GVS is ISO 27001 certified for information security and ISO 9001:2015 for quality management. Retention, access control and the grievance route are set out in the Trust Centre.

Why lenders empanel GVS

We are the empanelled RCU for Canara Bank and Punjab & Sind Bank, running customer due diligence on their lending. We have been verifying for Indian organisations since 2010.

2010
Verifying since

Genuine Verification Services Private Limited has run verification work for Indian organisations from New Delhi since then.

500+
Organisations served

Banks, NBFCs, staffing firms, IT companies, retail chains and gig platforms.

PSU banks
Empanelled RCU

Canara Bank and Punjab & Sind Bank, on customer due diligence for their lending.

ISO 27001
Certified information security

Independently audited, alongside ISO 9001:2015 for quality management.

Where your book actually is

Metro coverage is not what separates agencies. A field network across Tier 2, Tier 3 and rural pin codes is what makes a residence or unit visit possible where the address is not on any map service.

Independent of the channel

We are engaged by your risk function and report to it. Nobody who sourced the file sees a finding first, which is the only condition under which an RCU finding means anything.

Committed turnaround per activity

Each activity carries its own turnaround, set in the mandate against your product and volume rather than quoted as one number for everything.

The number that makes the case. Banks and financial institutions reported 10,114 fraud cases involving Rs 48,021 crore in FY26. Across the last three years the number of cases has fallen for public and private sector banks while the amount involved has risen, which is a sentence about bigger frauds getting through rather than fewer. Source: RBI Annual Report 2025-26.

Questions lenders ask

What does RCU stand for?
Risk Containment Unit, also written Risk Control Unit. It is the independent fraud-control function that sits beside credit appraisal. Credit asks whether the borrower can repay; the RCU asks whether the application is genuine. It is the last gate before sanction and disbursement.
Is RCU the same as CPV?
No. Contact point verification confirms that the applicant is reachable at the address and number given. RCU is the wider fraud investigation: document authenticity, income tested against the income proofs on file and the tax record, business existence, and screening against your fraud database. Both run before disbursement and GVS does both.
What percentage of files do you sample?
Whatever your policy sets. Screening is total, so 100% of files logged in are read. Sampling is the share of those files that goes to full verification, and most lenders set it by product and ticket size with a higher share on secured and high-value files. We run to the mandate and report against it.
Do you verify guarantors as well as borrowers?
Yes. Address, identity and employment checks apply to guarantors on the same terms as the borrower, because a file is only as good as the person standing behind it. Public sector bank empanelment scopes name guarantors explicitly.
What happens when you find a forged document?
It is reported as a negative with the discrepancy named and the source response attached: what the document says, what the issuing authority holds, and the difference between them. The lending decision stays yours. We do not soften a negative and we do not recommend a sanction.
Do you cover Tier 2 and Tier 3 locations?
Yes. Metro coverage is not what separates verification agencies; the smaller towns and rural pin codes are. Our field network runs across India, which is what makes a residence or unit visit possible where the address is not on any map service.

Related

Put a live batch through

Send us files from a real product and judge us on the findings.

Talk to sales