GVS - Genuine Verification Services
Talk to sales

Directorship and DIN verification

Find out what a candidate directs, and what their Director Identification Number says about it, from the statutory record rather than from a declaration.

Consent received
Report ready

Live verification

DIN and status Confirmed
Companies directed Retrieved
Disqualification None found
Declared interests Compared
Case GVS-251314 of 4 complete
MCA recordsVerification active
Directorship and DIN, India
Sneha Iyer

Checked against MCA director
and company master data

DIN
Active, KYC current
Companies
2 active, 1 struck off
Earliest appointment
Jun 2019
To review
1 undeclared
Specimen record. No real candidate data.
Trusted by 500+ companies
Canara BankChannelplayTata AIG InsuranceMacgenceIndiaMARTOlive Green ConsultingPunjab & Sind BankZee MediaJobkartKazamAvalon Information SystemsMeruBTCQuytechGreat Eastern Energy CorporationGiginBharat BhushanPilot IndustriesShipex IndiaKW GroupWise FinServPTC NetworkOrcapodadaanSouthern TravelsElectricaBaby & Mom RetailSyscomLarkRoots DevelopersGMSCircleRightRudra ShieldEssential EnergyAviaxpert

What a directorship and DIN check confirms

Every director of an Indian company holds a Director Identification Number, and every appointment and cessation is filed with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. That makes directorship one of the few things about a candidate that can be read off a public statutory record instead of asked about. The check answers two questions: what does this person direct, and is the number behind it in good standing.

DIN and its status

Whether the number is valid and active, deactivated, surrendered or disqualified.

Companies directed

Every company the number is or has been attached to, current and past, from MCA master data.

Appointment and cessation dates

When each directorship began and ended, which is what exposes an overlap with declared employment.

Company standing

Whether each company is active, dormant, struck off or under liquidation.

Disqualification

Disqualification under section 164(2) of the Companies Act, which follows the person to every board they sit on.

Set against what was declared

The filed record placed beside what the candidate told you, so an omission reads as an omission.

Sources. MCA director master data and company master data, DIN status including DIR-3 KYC compliance, and the ROC filings behind each appointment and cessation. Struck off company lists published by the registrars. Every line cites the DIN or CIN it came from, so you can look it up yourself.

Two checks, run together

They are sold as one check and answer different questions. A valid number says nothing about what the person directs, and a list of directorships says nothing about whether the number behind them is clean.

The person

DIN validation

Confirms the number belongs to the candidate and is in good standing.

  1. The number is matched to the candidate's name, father's name and date of birth as filed.
  2. Status is read from MCA: active, deactivated, surrendered or disqualified.
  3. DIR-3 KYC compliance is checked, since a lapsed filing deactivates a number with nothing behind it.
  4. Disqualification under section 164(2) is reported with the company that triggered it.
The companies

Directorship search

Finds every company the candidate is or has been a director of.

  1. The number is used to pull the full list of current and past directorships.
  2. Each company's standing is read: active, dormant, struck off or under liquidation.
  3. Appointment and cessation dates are set against the employment history.
  4. Anything not declared to you is listed separately, with its CIN.

Where the law sits. Section 164(2) of the Companies Act 2013 disqualifies a director whose company has failed to file financial statements or annual returns for three continuous years, and section 167 governs when the office is vacated. A deactivated number is a different matter: it usually means the annual DIR-3 KYC was not filed, which is administrative. The report separates the two, because they are not the same conversation to have with a candidate.

How it works

Four steps. The record is public and filed, so the work is matching it to the right person and reading it correctly.

Consent and identifiers collected

Name, date of birth, father's name, and the number itself where the candidate has declared one.

Number matched and read

It is matched to the candidate on the identifiers as filed, then its status and KYC compliance are read.

Directorships pulled

Every current and past directorship attached to the number, with the standing of each company.

Report published

Directorships, dates, company standing and any disqualification, set against what the candidate declared, with the DIN or CIN behind each line.

Checks that run alongside it

Questions we get asked

What if the candidate says they have no DIN?
That is the claim the check tests. A search on name, father's name and date of birth against MCA director data will surface a number they hold, and an undeclared directorship is a more useful finding than a declared one.
Is an outside directorship a red flag?
Not by itself. A family company or a dormant entity is common and usually disclosed the moment you ask. What matters is whether it was declared, whether it competes with you, and whether the dates overlap with employment the candidate described as full time.
What does a deactivated DIN mean?
Usually that the annual DIR-3 KYC filing was missed. The number is deactivated until the filing is made, which is an administrative lapse rather than a finding against the person. Disqualification under section 164(2) is the serious one, and the report keeps the two apart.
Does this catch moonlighting?
It catches the incorporated kind. If a candidate runs a company, MCA records it, and the appointment dates show whether it ran alongside employment. A second job on someone else's payroll shows up in the UAN cross-check on an employment verification instead.
Do you check the companies themselves?
Their standing, yes: active, dormant, struck off or under liquidation, with the CIN for each. A full financial and litigation workup on a company is vendor due diligence, which is a different engagement.
Is any of this confidential information?
No, and that is the point. MCA director and company master data is a public statutory record. The check is faster and more defensible than asking, and the candidate can look up the same record.

Verify your next hire

Send us a pilot batch and judge us on the first report.

Talk to sales